High CourtsDivision Bench(2006) 11 CHH CK 0028

Smt. Varsha Rani Nag vs Herald Vinay Nadan

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 17 November 2006 · Citation: (2007) 1 CGLJ 145

HON’BLE JUDGES
D.R. Deshmukh, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
M.C.C. No. 347 of 2006

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 255 words

D.R. Deshmukh, J.—Heard.

2.

The applicant-wife has filed this application u/s 24 of the CPC for transfer of case No. 71-A of 2006 filed by the Respondent-husband u/s 22 of the Divorce Act, 1869 for judical separation before the 1 st Additional District Judge, Jugdalpur, to the Court of District Judge, Raipur of following grounds :

(A) The Petitioner is serving as Project Officer in Woman and Child Development Project, Abhanpur, District Raipur and it is extremely inconvenient for her to attend each and every hearing at Jagdalpur.

(B) That father of the Petitioner being aged 66 years is an old person and suffering from heart ailment and it is not possible for him to accompany the Petitioner to Jagdalpur on each and every hearing.

(C) A report was lodged by the Petitioner at P.S. Jagdalpur regarding threats and ill-behavior by the Respondent-husbnand wherein she has prayed for security at the time of attending Court at Jagdalpur.

3.

Learned Counsel for the applicant placed reliance on Sumita Singh Vs. Kumar Sanjay and Another, Considering the convenience of the wife, which is of paramount importance in such matters, I am of the considering opinion, in the facts and circumstances of the case indicated above, that it is expedient in the ends of justice that Case No. 71-A of 2006 (Herald Vinay Nadan v. Smt. Varsha Rani Nag) before the Court of 1st Additional District Judge, Bastar at Jagdalpur be transferred to the Court of District Judge, Raipur. Ordered accordingly. M.C.C. No. 347 of 2006 is allowed.