Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2026) 08 ITAT CK 6288

Smt. Sudesh vs Assessment Unit

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi · Decided on 4 August 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satbeer Singh Godara, J
CASE NUMBER
ITA No.6637/Del/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 208 words

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2020-21, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2026-27/1088412060(1), dated 13.04.2026 involving proceedings under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. She is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.

2.

Learned departmental representative vehemently submits that both the lower authorities’ respective assessment and lower appellate findings have rightly added the impugned long-term capital gains amount to Rs.7,83,318/- in the assessee’s hands on account of transfer of her immovable properties/lands situated in the revenue estate of village - Kalanjri, district - Meerut. He accordingly seeks to confirm the impugned addition in the assessee’s instant second appeal as well.

3.

I have given my thoughtful consideration to the assessee’s and Revenue’s respective vehement pleadings. I find no reason to sustain the impugned long-term capital gains addition as there is no clear-cut finding, whatsoever, in both the learned lower authorities’ respective findings as to whether the assessee’s agricultural lands sold form a capital asset within the meaning of section 2(14)(iii) of the Act or not. Deleted accordingly for this precise reason in very terms.

4.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed.