Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2021) 10 AFT CK 0016

Smt Sonu W/o NC (E) Harender Kumar vs Union of India & Ors.

Armed Forces Tribunal · Decided on 8 October 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajendra Menon, Chairperson, (J) · P.M. Hariz, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
OA (Appeal) 2175 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 677 words

OA (Appeal) 2175/2021

1.

Invoking the jurisdiction of this Tribunal under Section 14 of   the    Armed    Forces    Tribunal    Act, 2007,    the wife    of the employee concerned NC  (E)  Harender Kumar, a  LASCAR of 27 Wing, HQ South Western Air Command, Indian Air Force, Lekawada,  Gandhinagar,  has  filed  this  appeal  claiming  the following reliefs:

"  Not to confirm the finding and sentence of the aforementioned court-martial, if not confirmed, till the applicant  prefers  a  pre-confirmation  petition  under section 161(1) of the Air Force Act, 1950.   Any pre-confirmation petition purported to be submitted by the husband of the applicant through the aforementioned Defending Officer or by himself may be disregarded;

(b)  To   provide   the   following   documents   to   the applicant:-

(i) The   Informal   Charge   Sheet (P-13)   and Compliance of Rule 24 AFR Proforma iro the hearing of charge held in the case;

(ii)  Report on Application (RAT)  for trial on which trial by DCM of NC  (E)  Hare nder Kumar was ordered.

(iii)   The Summary of Evidence (SoE) recorded in  the  case  along  with  the  Formal  Charge Sheet on which the SoE was recorded;

(iv) Proceedings of the DCM held in the case;

(v) Opinion of the service Psychiatrist obtained with respect to the soundness or otherwise of mind of the huysband of the applicant at the   time   of  commission   of  the   alleged charge, as well as his fitness to undergo trial in terms of Army Order 13/2001 on the subject."

2.

It  is  the  case  of the  appellant  that  her  husband  is  a psychiatric patient and without understanding the implication of the action being taken against him in the DCM, he made certain submissions pleading guilty in the matter which could not be accepted and therefore challenging the three months detention and the dismissal order this appeal has been filed for the reliefs as claimed for.

3.

A two-fold grievance was made before us at the time of hearing;   one   that   the   applicant   should   be   released   from custody/attachment, permitted to undergo treatment  for the ailment and the second that the appellant, wife of the employee, is  unable  to  get  the  appeal  prepared  for  challenging  the dismissal order in the absence of the Court Martial proceedings and findings of the Court Martial being supplied to her.

4.

Today during the course of hearing learned counsel for the respondents has produced before us the order passed by the HQ South Western Air Command, Indian Air Force, Lekawada, Gandhinagar and on going through the same we find that the sentence of imprisonment has been remitted and the husband of the appellant has now been released.  That being so, the prayer made in the OA for release from custody/attachment has been rendered   infructuous.  As   far  as  grant  of  Court   Martial proceedings   and   the    findings   of   the    Court   of   Inquiry proceedings are concerned, we see no reason as to why the same  should  not  be  supplied  to  the  appellant,  wife  of the employee   concerned,   looking   to    the   peculiar   facts   and circumstances of the case, particularly the mental health of the appellant's  husband.  That  apart,  learned  counsel  for  the respondents fairly states before us that the respondents will supply    to the    employee concerned the Court    Martial proceedings and the findings of the Court of Inquiry to the extent permissible under the statutory rules.

4.

That being so, we dispose of this matter directing the respondents to supply the proceedings of the Court Martial and the  findings  of the  Court  of  Inquiry  in  accordance  to  the statutory rules within a period of fifteen days form the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the appellant, wife of the employee   concerned,   will   be   at   liberty   to   challenge   the punishment now subsisting under Section 15 of the Act by invoking the jurisdiction of this Tribunal. All such medical documents/papers which are required for preparation of the appeal so also the medical documents required by the appellant for further treatment of her husband should also be supplied to the appellant as per the rules.

5.

In view of the aforesaid, the matter stands disposed of.

DASTI