High CourtsDivision Bench(1997) 02 AHC CK 0053

Smt. Shashi Jain vs Income Tax Officer and Another

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 18 February 1997 · Citation: (1997) 228 ITR 682

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.K. Gulati, J · R. Dayal, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 100 of 1997

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 220 words
1.

By this petition, the petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari, quashing the notices dated November 18, 1996, u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1990-91, 1991-92, and also the notices dated September 6, 1996, issued under the same provision for the assessment years 1992-93, 1993-94, 1994-95 and 1995-96.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed Income Tax returns for all these years in time and she was assessed to tax u/s 143(1)(a) of the Act but subsequently notices have been issued u/s 148 of the Act on the basis of the valuer''s report even when the valuer did not give opportunity of being heard before making the report. The valuer''s report is with respect to the investment in the house constructed by the petitioner. In our view, no notice was required to be given before the issuance of notice u/s 148. We are not impressed with the contention that the impugned notices have been issued by the Assessing Officer without there being any reason to believe that any income chargeable to tax had escaped the assessment. However, the petitioner will have opportunity to contest the correctness of the valuer''s report during the course of assessment proceedings in pursuance of the notices u/s 148.

3.

The petition is dismissed in limine.