Supreme CourtFull Bench(1987) 06 SC CK 0008

Smt. Sattamma vs K. Rajaiah and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 29 June 1987 · Citation: (1987) 2 Crimes 902 : (1987) 3 JT 10 : (1987) 2 SCALE 10 : (1987) 3 SCC 447 : (1988) 1 ShimLC 125 : (1987) 2 UJ 480

HON’BLE JUDGES
R. S. Pathak, C.J · V. Khalid, J · Sabyasachi Mukherjee, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
C.R.P. No. 692 of 2009

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 266 words
1.

Special leave granted.

2.

In these appeals by special leave the appellant is aggrieved by the detention of her husband, Kotha Das, under the National Security Act, 1980, and prays for his release.

3.

Kotha Das was arrested on 16 February, 1986. On 17 February, 1986 an order of detention in respect of him was made under Sub-section (3) of Section 3 of the National Security Act 1980 by the Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City directing that Kotha Das be detained under Sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Act. It appears that after the case was referred by the State Government to the Advisory Board the Advisory Board reported that there was sufficient cause for the detention, and the State Government thereafter made an order on 11 April, 1986 directing the detention of the detenue for one year from the date of the detention order. Two successive writ petitions were filed by the appellant in the High Court of Andhra Pradesh challenging the detention of the detenue. A number of contentions have been raised before us in the attempt to show that the High Court his committed an error in rejecting the writ petitions. At the out-set we may note that according to Section 13 of the National Security Act 1980 the maximum period for which any person may be detained in pursuance of the detention order which has been confirmed u/s 12 of the Act is twelve months from the date of detention. The period of twelve months has expired. In the circumstances these appeals have become infructuous and are disposed of accordingly.