High CourtsSingle Bench(2010) 01 RAJ CK 0012

Smt. Pramila Kumari Sharma vs Shri Narayan Sharma

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 19 January 2010 · Citation: (2010) 1 WLN 245

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vineet Kothari, J
RESULT
Allowed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 363 words

Vineet Kothari, J.—By this transfer application, the petitioner-wife has sought transfer of Case No. 203/2009 Narayan Sharma v. Pramila Kumari Sharma filed u/s 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act pending before the Family Court, Ajmer seeking transfer of the case to the learned District and Sessions Judge, Merta on the ground of convenience as she is living with her parents at Merta.

2.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner-wife Mr. Vishal Sharma submitted that the lady being alone having child of 3 1/2 years son Keshav has extreme difficulty to attend the hearing at Ajmer Court by undertaking a journey of 2 hours on each occasion. He also submits that she is unemployed and now will have to seek employment to earn her livelihood.

3.

On the other hand, Mr. Mahendra Pareek, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent-husband opposed the transfer application on the ground that the respondent-husband is also living at Vijay Nagar, District Ajmer and has to travel at Ajmer Court for attending hearing. Therefore, inconvenience to both the parties is of the same amount and mere convenience of the petitioner-wife is not ground to transfer the proceedings from the Court having competent jurisdiction over the case.

4.

This Court had made efforts for reconciliation between the parties and the parties were also summoned in the Court and consultation were held in Chambers.

5.

Learned Counsels also made efforts for the same but the good sense does not seem to prevail on the husband. Therefore, this transfer application has to be decided on merits.

6.

Having heard learned Counsels and in view of the submissions made in the application and in view of the facts and circumstances of the case stated above, this Court considers expedient to transfer the proceedings of Case No. 203/2009 Narayan Sharma v. Pramila Kumari Sharma pending in the Family Court, Ajmer to the learned District and Sessions Judge, Merta.

7.

Accordingly, the transfer application is allowed and the record of the said case No. 203/2009 may be sent to the learned District and Sessions Judge, Merta City, Merta. The said Court is requested to decide the matter expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from today.