High CourtsSingle Bench(2012) 02 MAD CK 0107

Smt. Leelavathy Ammal vs The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai, Egmore, Chennai, The Inspector of Police G-7, Chetpet Police Station, Chetpet, Chennai-31 and Ramamoorthy No. 1, Pumping Station Road Chetpet, Chennai-31

Madras High Court · Decided on 16 February 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vinod K. Sharma, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 17992 of 2011 and M.P. No. 1 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 201 words

Honourable Mr. Justice Vinod K. Sharma

1.

Petitioner has approached this court with a prayer for issuance of writ in the nature of prohibition, to prohibit respondents 1 and 2 from

interfering with the civil dispute of the petitioner with the 3rd respondent. In support of the writ petition, the petitioner has placed on record two

complaints, which were filed by the petitioner. The submission of the petitioner is that no action has been taken on the complaint filed by the

petitioner, whereas on the complaint of 3rd respondent the petitioner has been called for investigation.

2.

Petitioner has not placed on record any notice issued by the Police department calling him to come for investigation in support of the allegation.

The petitioner has not impleaded any person by name who may have called the petitioner illegally for investigation. This court cannot take notice of

allegation, without person being party in individual capacity.

3.

The learned counsel for the state however made a statement that respondents 1 and 2 are not interfering with the civil dispute of the petitioner.

By recording the statement of learned counsel for the State, writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.