High CourtsSingle Bench(2013) 09 KAR CK 0354

Smt. Lakshmamma vs The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Hemavathi Channel Zone

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 19 September 2013

HON’BLE JUDGES
Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
M.S.A. No. 3 of 2012 (LA)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 429 words

Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J.—Heard the learned counsel representing the parties. This second appeal is by the claimant for enhancement as against the award passed by the Reference Court-Fast Track Court, Tiptur, in R.A. No. 363/2009, dated 1st October 2011. The claimant-appellant filed LAC. No. 204/2007 before Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Turuvekere claiming compensation in respect of the land bearing Survey No. 158, measuring 1 acre 15 guntas, situated at Gurlamutt village, Turuvekere Taluk which was acquired by the respondent for formation of Hemavathi Channel. The land is a garden land having 70 coconut tress and also one neem tree. The acquisition notification was in the year 1989 and after issuance of final notification, an award came to be passed by the Land Acquisition Officer on 28.6.1991 determining the market value of the dry land at Rs. 6,560/- per acre and for garden land at Rs. 19,000/- per acre. As no compensation has been awarded towards standing coconut trees and neem tree, claimant filed LAC. No. 204/2007. The Reference Court rejected the claim as barred by limitation. As against which, claimant preferred R.A. 363/2009 before the Fast Track Court, Tiptur The Appellate Court having entertained the main appeal filed, awarded compensation of Rs. 19,600/- per acre and also Rs. 700/- per coconut tree for 70 trees, with all consequential statutory benefits. Being not satisfied, the claimant-appellant is before this Court seeking enhancement of compensation.

2.

The learned counsel for the appellant relying upon the judgment and award passed by the very Reference Court in LAC. No. 129/2007, dated 31st July 2010, submitted that in that case, the land was acquired for the same purpose i.e., formation of Hemavathi Canal, wherein the Reference Court has awarded Rs. 33.750/- per acre for garden land and Rs. 2,800/- per coconut tree and hence, he seeks enhancement of compensation on the ground of parity as the land in question is a garden land and acquired for the same purpose. As the Reference Court in the connected matter has enhanced the compensation suitably, the same benefit has to be extended to this appellant also. Accordingly, the compensation awarded by the Appellate Court is further modified and enhanced to Rs. 33,750/- per acre and also at the rate of Rs. 2,800/- per coconut tree, with all consequential statutory benefits, interest and costs thereon.

Ordered accordingly. The respondent is directed to deposit the amount within 12 weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The difference of Court fee, if any, to be deposited shall be deposited within eight weeks from today.

Appeal is allowed.