High CourtsSingle Bench(2012) 11 UK CK 0012

Smt. Kusumlata @ Meghna Dwivedi and Vijan Veer Singh vs State of Uttarakhand and Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 22 November 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prafulla C. Pant, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Petition No. 1105 of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 362 words

Hon''ble Prafulla C. Pant, J.—Heard. By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioners have sought quashing of the First Information Report dated 01.12.2011, registered as Crime No. 180 of 2011, relating to offences punishable u/s 420, 467, 468 and 471 of I.P.C., at Police Station Cantt., District Dehradun.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that there was a civil dispute between the family members of the petitioners. Complainant is daughter-in-law of the petitioner No. 1. It is pointed out that the property dispute between the parties got settled, after the First Appeal No. 80 of 2009, was disposed of by this Court in terms of the compromise between the parties. It is contended that it is abuse of process of law on the part of the respondent No. 3 Punam Chauhan to implicate the petitioners in a criminal case disowning the compromise entered between the parties. Attention of this Court is drawn to Annexure No. 6 to the writ petition, which is a copy of the order dated 25.10.2010, passed by this Court in First Appeal No. 80 of 2009 and the copy of order dated 25.10.2010, passed in First Appeal No. 81 of 2009 which is annexure No. 7 to the writ petition.

3.

Admit the petition.

4.

Learned counsel for the State prays for and is allowed six weeks'' time to file the counter affidavit.

5.

Issue notice to the respondent No. 3 Smt. Punam Chauhan, who may also file her counter affidavit within a period of six weeks.

6.

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State, and after going through the papers on record, as an interim measure, it is directed that petitioners namely Smt. Kusumlata @ Meghna Dwivedi and Vijan Veer Singh shall not be arrested in connection with the First Information Report dated 01.12.2011, registered as Crime No. 180 of 2011, relating to offences punishable u/s 420, 467, 468 and 471 of I.P.C., at Police Station Cantt., District Dehradun, during investigation, provided they cooperate with the investigating agency (Interim Relief Application No. 12523 of 2012, stands disposed of). List after six weeks.