High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 08 RAJ CK 0027

Smt. Jyoti Panchal & Anr. vs State & Anr.

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 22 August 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dinesh Mehta
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
3816 of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

26 paragraphs · 246 words
1.

By way of the present writ petitions, the petitioners have

prayed directions to the respondents for providing appropriate

appointment, as they stood in the select list.

2.

During the pendency of the present writ petitions, the

respondents have stated that the appointment to the petitioner

could not be granted, as there was an interim order by the Hon''ble

Supreme Court in Special Leave Petitions (Civil) No. 23508 to

23513 titled as "State of Rajasthan Vs. Vikas Kumar Agarwal &

Ors.".

3.

Mr. Vikas Choudhary, learned Associate of Mr. S.S. Ladrecha,

learned Additional Advocate General, informs the Court that the

said SLPs have been decided by the Hon''ble Supreme Court, vide

its order dated 18.10.2016 and the Hon''ble Supreme Court has

affirmed the stand of the State of Rajasthan. He further adds that

subsequent thereof, the result of Teacher Grade-III, 2013 has

been revised, pursuant to two judgments in the case of Dheeraj &

Anr. Vs. State and Niranjan Lal Vs. State.

4.

After decision of the said SLP, which was pending before the

Hon''ble Supreme Court, there is no impediment in the way of the

Respondents. Hence, the Respondents are directed to proceed in

the matter and offer appointment to the Petitioners, if they fall in

merit list, after the revision of the result.

5.

Needless to clarify that the Petitioners'' case shall be

considered in accordance with the revised result.

6.

With the directions aforesaid, all the six the writ petitions

stand disposed of.