Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2025) 10 ITAT CK 2491

Smt. Anita Sharma L/H Sh. Shyam Lal vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-4, Hisar

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi · Decided on 29 October 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member
CASE NUMBER
ITA No.5944/Del/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 242 words

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1079654502(1), dated 14.08.2025, involving proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

Heard both the parties. Case file perused.

2.

It transpires during the course of hearing that the appellant herein, namely, Smt. Anita Sharma claims herself to be the legal representative of the deceased assessee Sh. Shyam Lal who is stated to have expired after institution of the lower appeal on 18.01.2020. That being the case, learned counsel could hardly dispute that there is no indication in the case records as to whether the appellant, the self-proclaimed legal representative herein, either manages or she has succeeded to estate of the deceased assessee as per section 2(29) of the Act r.w.s. 2(11) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Nor there is any indication in the case records that the learned departmental authorities have proceeded against her u/s 159 of the Act. Faced with this situation, it is deemed appropriate in the larger interest of justice to restore the appellant’s instant appeal back to the learned Assessing Officer to proceed afresh after verifying all the necessary facts and evidence(s); within three effective opportunities, in consequential proceedings.

All other remaining issue between the parties are kept open at this stage.

3.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.