High CourtsSingle Bench(2002) 01 MAD CK 0011

Sivakumar, Navaneetha Krishnan and Gurumurthy rep. by mother/guardian Parvathy vs The District Forest Officer, District Forest Officer, Tiruvannamalai, Neelayathatchi, Sairam, Jaisankar and Rajalakshmi

Madras High Court · Decided on 28 January 2002

HON’BLE JUDGES
K. Gnanaprakasam, J
CASE NUMBER
C.R.P. No. 2567 and C.M.P. No''s. 13565 and 13566 of 2001

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 242 words

K. Gnanaprakasam, J.—Though the nexus between the succession O.P. and the suit is little bit wanting, yet, we cannot overlook the fact

that the suit filed by the petitioners either has got to be stayed till the disposal of the succession O.P or it has got to be d simultaneously. The final

decision in the suit would depend upon the order that would be passed in the succession O.P. Of course, the petitioners could have also invoked

Section 10 C.P.C to stay the suit till the disposal of the succession O.P. But they are afraid as to how far that application would have been

considered. In the said peculiar circumstances, I feel that there is nothing wrong in transferring the original suit to be tried along with the succession

O.P, which is pending before the higher forum, namely, the Sub-Court. I also feel that no prejudice would be caused to the respondents if an order

is passed for simultaneous trial of the suit and the succession O.P. That, only in the said view of the matter, I am inclined to allow this revision and

set aside the order passed by the Court below.

2.In the result, the revision is allowed. It is hereby ordered that the suit pending before the District Munsif Court, Thiruvannamalai shall be

transferred and posted along with the succession O.P pending before the Sub-Court, Thiruvannamalai for simultaneous trial. No costs.

Consequently, C.M.P.Nos.13565 and 13566 of 2001 are closed.