Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2019) 01 SC CK 0160

Sitaram vs State Of Uttar Pradesh & Anr

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 3 January 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.K. Sikri, J · S. Abdul Nazeer, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 98 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 233 words

After hearing learned counsel for the parties on 03.07.2018, following Order was passed:

"Learned counsel for the respondent(s) to take instructions as to whether the petitioner can be accommodated in District Jail, Mandi, H.P. or in the alternative in District Jail Dharamshala, H.P.

List the matter after two weeks."

Pursuant to the aforesaid directions given by this Court, learned counsel for the respondent has obtained instructions. He has handed over a copy of the affidavit filed on behalf of the State of Himachal Pradesh by Mr. Somesh Goyal, who is presently posted as Director General of Prisons and Correctional Services, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla.

Along with this affidavit, a Chart is enclosed giving the status of 16 Jails in Himachal Pradesh. From the said Chart, the learned counsel points out that insofar as District Jails in Mandi and Dharamshala are concerned they are already overcrowded. He has suggested, on instructions, that the petitioner can be accommodated either in Model Central Jail, Kanda or Model Central Jail, Nahan.

Learned counsel for the petitioner accepts that the petitioner be shifted to Model Central Jail, Kanda.

Having regard to the peculiar facts of this case and without treating it as a precedent, we direct that the petitioner shall immediately be shifted to Model Central Jail, Kanda, to serve his remaining sentence.

The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.