High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 02 KL CK 0046

SIDHARTH SREEKUMAR vs KERALA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES & ORS

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 1 February 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anu Sivaraman
CASE NUMBER
3541 of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 215 words
1.

This writ petition is filed seeking directions to the respondents 1 to 4 to take urgent and necessary steps for revaluation/fresh valuation of the

answer sheets of the petitioner in respect of physiology paper I and II. It is submitted that going by Ext.P8 regulations, fresh evaluation will be

conducted only on the recommendation of the Board of Adjudication of Students Grievances. The petitioner has submitted Ext.P9 representation

before the Board of Adjudication of Students Grievances and seeks a consideration of the same.

2.

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University, I am of the

opinion that Ext.P9 request preferred by the petitioner before the Board of Adjudication of Students Grievances is liable to be considered and

disposed of, in accordance with law.

3.

In the above view of the matter, there will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to take up, consider and pass orders on Ext.P9 request made by

the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. In case the Board issues favourable

recommendations, the same shall be considered without delay by the governing Council and revaluation shall also be conducted without delay.

The writ petition is ordered accordingly.