High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 03 KL CK 0070

SIDDIQUE, S/O. ABDULLA vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR DISTRICT, KANNUR

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 28 March 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
K.Vinod Chandran
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
27320 of 2015 (L)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

49 paragraphs · 390 words
1.

The petitioner was aggrieved with the demand

notice, as per Ext.P7, and the attachment, as per

Ext.P8, under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968.

Admittedly, there was Motor Vehicle tax due from the

petitioner, from the year 2010.

2.

The ground raised was one of limitation which

is not sustainable since the dues to the State could be

recovered within thirty years from the date of such

default. The dues are under the Kerala Motor Vehicle

Taxation Act, 1976. In such circumstance, there is no

ground for interference with the Revenue Recovery

proceedings.

3.

The petitioner has a further contention that

the petitioner had paid Rs.50,000/- at the time of

admission and now the Government has brought out a

Circular bearing No.30/2016 dated 15.12.2016 to

provide Amnesty for tax dues prior to 01.07.2011. The

prayer now made, at the time of hearing, is that

Rs.50,000/- paid by the petitioner may be adjusted

towards the Amnesty scheme.

4.

The Amnesty scheme itself was brought out

only on 15.12.2016. The payment made was by way of

an interim order dated 16.09.2015, long before the

Amnesty scheme came into operation. In such

circumstance, Rs.50,000/- cannot be adjusted to the

Amnesty scheme, since the same would have been

adjusted to the tax dues for the earliest period in which

the default occurred. If, after satisfaction of Rs.50,000/-

in the earliest period, any demand is remaining due and

payable prior to 01.07.2011, then, the same shall be

considered under the Amnesty scheme by the

respondent.

5.

The further contention is also with respect to

G-Forms filed for the period 2012-2013 (Ext.P5) and

2013-2014 (Ext.P6). The same would be considered by

the respondent on production of the certified copy of

this judgment. The petitioner is directed to produce the

certified copy of this judgment before the 2nd

respondent immediately and the 2nd respondent shall

consider the issue expeditiously to decide on whether

the petitioner is entitled to the Amnesty scheme. The

petitioner shall also be permitted to make the payment

under the Amnesty scheme before 31.03.2017. For the

balance period, the 2nd respondent shall consider the

issue of G-Form and issue a fresh demand, based on

which the petitioner could seek necessary payment

before the 3rd respondent. Exts.P7 and P8 shall stand

stayed for a period of two weeks.

The writ petition is disposed of.