High CourtsDivision Bench(1929) 10 MAD CK 0069

Shum Shu Bibi vs Muhammad Rashid Ali Khan and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 25 October 1929 · Citation: AIR 1930 Mad 355 : 126 Ind. Cas. 110(1)

HON’BLE JUDGES
Walsh, J · Kumaraswami Sastri, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 87 words
1.

We think that an order directing a certain amount to be paid into Court on an application for security for costs is an order under Order XLI, Rule 10, Schedule I, Civil Procedure Code, the non-compliance with which will entail the dismissal of the appeal. In this case the amount was not paid into Court within the time ordered, and Phillips, J., dismissed the second appeal. We see no grounds for interference. This Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed with costs of respondents Nos. 1 to 4.