Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 06 ITAT CK 1669

Shubhi Steel vs ITO

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi · Decided on 5 June 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
C.N. Prasad, Judicial Member · Renu Jauhri, Accountant Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No.6995/Del/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 158 words

PER C.N. PRASAD, J.M.

This appeal is filed by the assessee against order of Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi dated 03.09.2025 for the A.Y. 2017-18.

2.

Ld. Counsel for the assessee at the outset submitted that appeal was passed by the Ld. CIT(A) exparte without deciding the issues on merits. Ld. Counsel for the assesse submits that one more opportunity may be given to the assessee to explain before the Ld. CIT(A) the deposits made into the bank account.

3.

The Ld. DR has no serious objection in restoring the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(A).

4.

Considering the rival submissions and perusing the orders of the authorities below. We feel it appropriate to restore the appeal to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) for deciding the issues afresh in accordance with law after providing adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

5.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.