High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 01 DEL CK 3743

Shubham Pratap Singh vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS) & Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 5 January 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tushar Rao Gedela, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 138/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 443 words

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. (ORAL)

(The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)

CM APPL. 632/2024

1.

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2.

The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 138/2024 & CM APPL. 631/2024 (Stay)

3.

This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking grant of writ in the nature of Certiorari/Mandamus thereby allowing the petitioner to join the allotted school, i.e. respondent no.3 on the basis of the documents produced by the petitioner.

4.

At the outset, Mr. R. Gowri Shankar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent – Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS) objects to the very maintainability of the present writ petition and submits that under Section 14(2) of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, the present petition is not maintainable before this Court and the petitioner would be well advised to approach the Administrative Tribunal in this regard.

5.

Learned counsel also has furnished across the Bench, the judgment of a Coordinate Bench of this Court dated 26.09.2023 in W.P.(C) 9008/2023 Piyush Tyagi vs. Kendirya Vidyalaya Sangathan, which on similar facts had directed the petitioner therein to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal, being a forum of first instance and having competence and jurisdiction to adjudicate the service matters in relation to the recruitment, etc.

6.

Mr. Karan Babuta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, in view of the aforesaid judgment, prays that keeping in view the time constraint, the present petition itself be remitted to the Central Administrative Tribunal as an original application, which may considered on its own merits.

7.

Accordingly, in exercise of the powers of 226 conferred upon this Court by the Constitution of India and in the peculiar fact situation, the present petition be transferred/remitted to the Principal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi, for being treated as an original application of the petitioner and be heard and considered and disposed of in accordance with law.

8.

Accordingly, the present petition be transferred and listed before the Central Administrative Tribunal on 09.01.2024. The concerned Central Administrative Tribunal is requested to take up the matter on urgent basis, keeping in view the urgency in the facts of the case

9.

In the meanwhile, since the KVS had extended time for joining for a period of 15 days, which is expiring today, i.e., 05.01.2024, this Court is of the considered opinion that since the matter is now being placed before the Central Administrative Tribunal, the time for joining be extended till 20.01.2024 in the interests of justice.

10.

In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.

11.

Order dasti under signatures of Court Master.