High CourtsDivision Bench(1910) 02 MAD CK 0071

Shruvararayan alias Anujan Kunjunni Raja and Others vs Pulthia Kovila Katti Vararayan alias Unni Anujan Raja and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 February 1910 · Citation: 7 Ind. Cas. 268

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ralph Benson, J · Krishnaswamy Aiyer, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 168 words
1.

This is a suit for contribution for costs recovered from the plaintiffs and defendants sued as plaintiffs. That suit was for maintenance against a karnavathi and her anandravans. The suit was decreed against the karnavathi but dismissed with costs against the anandravans. Looking at paragraph 14 of the judgment in that case Exhibit III, we are not disposed to think that the joinder of the other defendants in that case was otherwise than bona fide. We agree with the Munsif in the present case in holding that the defendants have failed to show that there was any misconduct in the plaintiffs in impleading the defendants whose costs they were made to pay. The rule in Merryweather v. Nixon 16 R.R. 810 : 8 TR 186, is one of doubtful expediency. It certainly is not to be extended to cases where costs have been ordered in a bona fide litigation, see Shakul Kameed Ali Sahib v. Syed Ibrahim Sahib 26 M. 373. We must dismiss the second appeal.