High CourtsDivision Bench(2026) 11 MEG CK 0542

Shri. Swik Symbei vs State Of Meghalaya

Meghalaya High Court · Decided on 4 November 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
B. Bhattacharjee, J · W. Diengdoh, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Crl.M.C. No. 264 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 278 words
1.

Mr. P. Ghosh, learned counsel on behalf of the learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant/appellant Ms. N.M. Kharshemlang has submitted that the applicant/appellant after his conviction has preferred an appeal before this Court on being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and the related order of sentence dated 06.01.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Mawkyrwat in POCSO Case No. 11 of 2015 under Section 376(2)(f) IPC read with Section 3(a)/4 of the POCSO Act. However, while preferring the same, a delay of 2059 days has occurred. Hence, the application.

2.

The learned counsel has submitted that the applicant after exhausting all means was not able to prefer the appeal since the applicant was faced with financial inability and this has caused for the delay in filing the appeal. The applicant, finally, through the jail authorities had sought for legal aid in preferring the appeal and the time taken in the process of legal aid had also attributed to the delay in filing the appeal within the statutory period which cause was beyond the control of the applicant.

3.

The learned counsel therefore prays that the application may be allowed and delay of 2059 days may accordingly be condoned.

4.

Mr. H. Kharmih, learned Addl. P.P has no objection to the prayer for condonation.

5.

We have considered the submission and on perusal of the pleadings made in this application, this Court is hereby persuaded to allow the prayer made.

6.

Accordingly, the delay of 2059 days in preferring the related appeal is hereby condoned.

7.

Registry to diarize the appeal and list the same for admission after 1(one) week.

8.

Misc. Case disposed of.