High CourtsDivision Bench(2026) 11 MEG CK 0543

Shri. Stam Surong vs The State Of Meghalaya & Anr.

Meghalaya High Court · Decided on 4 November 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
W. Diengdoh, J · B. Bhattacharjee, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Crl.M.C./260/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 282 words

Per W. Diengdoh, (J):

1.

Heard Ms. I.M. Lyngdoh, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant, who has submitted that the applicant has preferred an appeal before this Court against the impugned judgment and related order of sentence dated 04.02.2026 passed by the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, West Jaintia Hills District, Jowai in Sessions Case No. 37 of 2015, whereby, he was convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with fine of ₹ 5000/- (Rupees five thousand) only, and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further simple imprisonment of 2(two) months for an offence punishable under Section 302 IPC.

2.

However, while preferring an appeal, a delay of 194 days has occurred, since the applicant was not in a position to engage a private counsel. As such, due to circumstances which is beyond the control of the applicant, he could not prefer an appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. It was only when a legal aid was accorded to him that the related appeal has been filed. This being the case, the learned Legal Aid Counsel prays that this Court may be pleased to condone the delay in filing the related appeal.

3.

Ms. I. Lyngwa, learned Addl. PP appearing for the State respondent has no objection to the prayer for condonation of the delay.

4.

On consideration of the submission made, we are persuaded to allow this application on being satisfied that the grounds cited for the delay contain sufficient cause. Accordingly, the delay of 194 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned.

5.

Registry is directed to diarize the appeal and list it for admission after 1(one) week.

6.

Misc. Case disposed of.