High CourtsSingle Bench(2012) 03 SHI CK 0538

Shri Rajinder Sood vs Himachal Pradesh Agro-Industries Corporation Limited, Nigam Vihar Complex, Shimla (HP) and State of Himachal Pradesh

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 16 March 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Surinder Singh, J
CASE NUMBER
C.W.P. No. 314 of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 315 words

Surinder Singh, J.—The petitioner is a retiree from the respondent-corporation. Precisely he seeks the relief for the release of his retiral benefits and also difference between pre-revised and revised salary w.e.f. 1.1.2006 to 31.7.2011. The petitioner was Accounts Officer in the respondent-corporation and retired on 31.7.2011. He has been striving hard to get retiral benefits but the respondent-corporation was insensitive and turned deaf ears even towards his representations and even did not respond. In other similar matter respondent-corporation highlighted their financial difficulties till they are bailed out by some package by the respondent-State. The contentions so raised stood rejected in CWP No. 2937 of 2009 decided on 6.12.2010 titled Veer Singh Chauhan versus H.P. Agro Industries Corp. Ltd. and another, it was observed that it is not for this Court to direct the State to give financial package to a sick Corporation. Even the Principal Division Bench in Rajinder Singh Jishtu versus State of H.P. & Ors CWP No. 455 of 2011 along with seven other connected matters took note of the situation but however, rejected the plea of the respondent-corporation and granted similar relief sought. In that petition, respondent-corporation also moved an application CMP No. 9871 of 2011 seeking extension of time for complying the judgment which was allowed vide order dated 2.12.2011.

2.

The respondent-corporation does not dispute the claim of the petitioner, therefore, the petitioner is held entitled for the above relief. Thus, respondent-corporation is directed to pay the entire retiral benefits, including the arrears of salary to the petitioner along with interest @ 9% per annum w.e.f. 31.7.2011 till the payment of the amount within three months from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment/order. Failing to pay the amount due, it shall carry an interest @ 12% per annum from the date it fell due. The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.