High CourtsDivision Bench(2012) 01 DEL CK 0458

Shri J.R. Sood and Others vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Delhi High Court · Decided on 2 January 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pratibha Rani, J · Pradeep Nandrajog, J
CASE NUMBER
Regular First Appeal (OS) 100 of 1998

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 402 words

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.—Two suits filed in the singular and decided in singular are being disposed of by a singular order for the reason a common issue arises for consideration in both the appeals.

2.

Subject matter of municipal assessment in the suit which has resulted in filing of RFA (OS) No.100/1998, is the building popularly known as EROS Cinema. The property which formed the subject matter of the suit relatable to RFA (OS) No.101/1998 is VISHAL Cinema.

3.

While determining the ratable value of the two Cinema buildings, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi took into account the value of the plant and machinery installed in the two Cinema buildings. The assessment was challenged by way of a suit.

4.

Vide judgment(s) and decree(s) dated 25.08.1998, both suits have been held to be barred and hence the plaint(s) stand rejected. It has been held that the plaintiff(s) have an efficacious alternative remedy to challenge the assessment by filing an appeal u/s 169 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957.

5.

Pertaining to the assessibility of the plant and machinery situated in and upon any land or building, by relying upon sub Section 3 of Section 116 of Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, the issue has attained finality before Supreme Court in the decision reported as Krishna Mohan Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others, The Supreme Court has held that while determining the ratable value of a land or a building, the value of the plant and machinery installed or brought upon the land or building cannot be taken into account while determining the standard rent and therefrom the ratable value of the building.

6.

Suffice would it be to state that if a property is not exigible to tax, if sought to be taxed, the said action can be challenged by a suit notwithstanding a statutory remedy of appeal being available.

7.

Since the issue at hand stands settled by an authoritative pronouncement of the Supreme Court, we dispose of the appeal(s) as also the suit(s) filed by the appellant(s) and decree the suit(s) quashing the assessments which were challenged in the two suits and issue a direction to the MCD to reassess the subject properties, for the relevant period, in accordance with law by taking into account the decision of the Supreme Court reported as Krishna Mohan Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others,

8.

No costs.