High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 11 DEL CK 2574

Shri Hukam Chand & Anr. vs State (NCT Of Delhi) & Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 6 November 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mini Pushkarna, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 2681/2020 & CM APPL. 9334/2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 289 words

MINI PUSHKARNA, J. (ORAL):

1.

The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to respondent nos. 2 to 3, to take action against the property bearing No. 1/2320, Main Maindoli Road, Shahdara, Delhi-110032, on the ground of unauthorized construction and illegal activity.

2.

A Status Report dated 21st July, 2025, has been filed on behalf of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”), relevant portions of which, read as under:

“xxx xxx xxx

Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment

xxx xxx xxx”

3.

Perusal of the aforesaid Status Report filed on behalf of the MCD clearly shows that there exists no encroachment in the property in question.

4.

Further, the said property is being used for trade storage and sale of sweets/namkeens shop, having a Health Trade License, which was valid up to 31st March, 2025. Subsequently, the said Health Trade License for the premises in question, has been renewed and the same is now valid up to 31st March, 2028.

5.

An affidavit dated 09th May, 2022 has also been filed on behalf of the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (“DPCC”), relevant portions of which, are reproduced as under:

“xxx xxx xxx

Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment

xxx xxx xxx”

6.

Perusal of the aforesaid affidavit filed on behalf of DPCC, clearly shows that the unit in question is having valid consent to operate from the DPCC, which is valid till 25th November, 2025.

7.

Thus, it is seen that the business being run from the premises in question is on the basis of a valid Municipal Health Trade License and a valid consent to operate from the DPCC.

8.

Accordingly, no orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition.

9.

Noting the aforesaid, the present writ petition, along with the pending application, is accordingly disposed of.