High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 08 DEL CK 1699

Shri Dushyant Tandon vs Manish Khosla

Delhi High Court · Decided on 19 August 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Jain, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
CM(M) 1540/2025 &CM APPL. 50605-50606/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 243 words
1.

Petitioner is stated to be the Director of Judgment Debtor Company (JD Company).

2.

He is aggrieved by order dated 08.08.2025 passed by learned Executing Court whereby there is a direction of issuance of warrants of attachment, against the movable properties of judgment debtor ,as per the list furnished.

3.

During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner could not point out any illegality or impropriety or perversity in the impugned order.

4.

His only grievance is that the JD Company is no longer functional.

5.

However, fact remains that if the decree holder has been in a position to place on record certain details of the movable assets of the JD Company, learned Executing Court can always take appropriate step for realization of decretal amount by directing attachment of such movable properties.

6.

As far as the petitioner herein is concerned, the learned Trial Court has directed him to file affidavit in terms of Order XXI Rule 41(2) CPC asking him to disclose about his assets, income and expenditure in the prescribed form.

7.

Be that as it may, finding no illegality or perversity in the impugned order, the present petition is hereby dismissed.

8.

The next date before the learned Executing Court is stated to be 29.08.2025 and this order would not preclude the petitioner herein to make further submissions before the learned Executing Court in relation to the abovesaid execution petition.

9.

Petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.