High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 07 MP CK 0146

Shreyanshi Pandey vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 17 July 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mohd. Fahim Anwar, J
RESULT
Allowed/ Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision No. 275 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 442 words

This criminal revision has been filed by the applicant under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 against the

judgment dated 12.12.2019 passed by the learned XVIIIth Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal, in Criminal Appeal No.627/2019 confirming the order

dated 21.11.2019 passed in Criminal Case No.628/2019 by the learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, District Bhopal, whereby

application for bail has been rejected.

The applicant has been arrested by the Police Station Ashoka Garden, Bhopal, in connection with Crime No.No.462/2019 for the offence under

Section 302, 201/34 of IPC.

The case of the prosecution is that, on 28.7.2019 at about 3:25 am information was received by Police Station Ashoka Garden, Bhopal from Hamidiya

Hospital, Bhopal that deceased Piyush Jain, aged about 20 years was brought to the hospital for treatment of head injury and he has been declared

dead. On that basis marg was registered and the postmortem was conducted. After interrogation, the memorandum of applicant and other co-accused

were recorded in which the applicant had admitted that she was in love relationship with the deceased and he used to call her on telephone. On that

basis applicant has been made accused in the aforesaid offence. The applicant was under 18 years of age, therefore is tried as a juvenile.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has not played any role in the alleged incident. It is also submitted that in view of the

mandatory provisions for bail under the Act, the applicant is entitled for bail/supurdnama to her father. It is further submitted that the investigation is

complete and charge-sheet has been filed. The applicant is in custody since 31.07.2019 and the trial will take long time to conclude. In view of the

aforesaid, prayer is made to allow the revision and release the applicant on the case, on the basis of which I consider that this revision ought to be

allowed. Accordingly, this revision is allowed and impugned order dated 21.11.2019 passed in Criminal Case No.628/2019 by the learned Principal

Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, District Bhopal, is set aside. It is directed that if the guardian of the present applicant furnishes a personal bond in

the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) and a solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Court with an

undertaking that the guardian will take care of the juvenile in conflict with law and also take care that she will not indulge in any kind of criminal

activity, the custody of the applicant be handed over to her guardian.

This revision stands allowed and disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.