High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 01 CHH CK 0094

Shraddheya Bhagat vs South Eastern Coalfields Limited And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 8 January 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S) No.1127 Of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 346 words

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1.

The petitioner's father died in harness on 29-7-2008. The petitioner made an application for dependent employment, that has not been considered

and certain information was asked on 13-11-2010 and it has been replied by the petitioner on 8-1-2011, yet the petitioner's case has not been

considered for dependent employment leading to filing of this writ petition.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the validity of death certificate of the petitioner's father has been questioned by SECL and

appointment has not been given, whereas death certificate has been issued by the competent authority.

3.

Whereas, learned counsel appearing for the respondents/SECL submits that Form PS-3 submitted by the petitioner is tampered and forged.

4.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

5.

It appears from Annexure P-10 that the SECL has not considered the case of the petitioner simply questioning the authority of the Executive

Magistrate to grant death certificate. If any doubt is there, the respondents were obliged to make an enquiry, if any, and could have considered the

case of the petitioner thereafter, but that has not been done and since 2008, the case of the petitioner has been held-up and case of the petitioner for

dependent employment has not been considered. SECL is a State under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. It is a Government of India

undertaking. It has to act fairly and objectively. It cannot act arbitrarily and highhandedly. Non- consideration of the petitioner's case for dependent

employment since 2008 on the part of SECL questioning the issuance of death certificate by the competent authority, is clearly arbitrary and whimsical

as well. In view of the above, there is no reason not to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of dependent employment.

6.

The writ petition is allowed and SECL is directed to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of dependent employment on the date of making

application within 45 days from today. SECL is saddled with a cost of ₹ 10,000/- payable within two weeks form today.