High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 02 CHH CK 0155

Shobha Kushvaha vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 4 February 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Misc. Criminal Case No. 1279 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 280 words

@JUDGMENT-JUDGMENT

1.

The accused/applicant has moved this bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for releasing her on regular bail

during trial in connection with Crime No.359/2019, registered at Police Station Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja for the offence punishable under Section

21(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

2.

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that 50.20 gms. of brown sugar was recovered from the possession of the applicant.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has not committed any offence, she has been falsely implicated in the case and charge-

sheet has been filed. The applicant has been arrested on 14-6-2019. He further submits that the quantity of brown sugar recovered from the

possession of the applicant is more than small quantity, but less than commercial quantity.

4.

On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the application and submits that the applicant has already been convicted under Section 20(b) of

the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, in which she was granted bail by this Court and taking the advantage of the privilege of

bail, she again involved in this offence and therefore she be not released on bail.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the submissions.

6.

Taking into consideration the nature and gravity of offence, facts and circumstances of the case, particularly, taking into account the previous

history of the applicant that during the bail period, she was found involved in the aforesaid offence and 50.20 gms. of brown sugar was recovered

from her, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant. The application is accordingly rejected.