High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 11 SHI CK 0223

Shivalaya Construction Private Limited vs State Of H.P. & Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 27 November 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Narayana Swamy, CJ
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Arbitration Case No. 62 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 394 words

L. Narayana Swamy, CJ

1.

In this petition under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner, which is a Company and to whom the work was

awarded for widening and strengthening of existing single/inter-mediate lane carriage way with geometric improvement of two-lane carriage way in

KM 58/100 to 105/0 of National Highway 70 by the respondents, seeks a direction for appointment of an Arbitrator for resolving the dispute between

the petitioner and the respondents.

2.

Respondents have filed reply in which objection regarding claim being barred by limitation has been taken.

3.

Per contra, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner relied upon the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court passed in SLP(C)

No.11476 of 2018, tittled M/s Uttrakhand Porv Sanik Kalyan Nigam Ltd. vs. Northern Coal Field Ltd,, on 27.11.2019, wherein it has been held that

delay itself is question of law and facts and has to be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal or Arbitrator appointed by the Court.

4.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It is held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court that the claim barred by

limitation is question of law and facts which the learned Arbitral Tribunal or the Arbitrator has to consider on the basis of record. Accordingly, I deem

it proper to appoint Mr.A.K. Goel, retired Judge of this Court as an Arbitrator. Aforesaid Arbitrator is requested to enter into reference within a

period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It shall be open for the learned Arbitrator to determine his own procedure with

the consent of the parties. Otherwise also, entire procedure with regard to fixing of time limit for filing pleadings or passing of Award stands

prescribed under Sections 23 and 29A of the Act. Liberty is also reserved to the respondent to raise objections, if any, by way of filing counter claim

before the Arbitrator. Ordered accordingly.

5.

Needless to say, award shall be made strictly as per provisions contained in Arbitration and Conciliation Act. A copy of this order shall be made

available to the learned Arbitrator named above, by the Registry of this Court within one week enabling him to take steps for commencement of the

arbitration proceedings within stipulated period.

6.

The petition is disposed of accordingly alongwith pending application(s), if any.