AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
We are clearly of opinion that an appeal lies against the award in so far as it directs the money to be invested in the purchase of Government
promissory notes, it being the appellant''s case that, no order for investment should have been made, the laud being alienable. The language of
Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act (I of 1894) is wide enough to admit of an appeal in such a case as this.
Though the precise nature of the family charity is not slated, yet it is the case of both the parties that the land taken up by Government was the
endowment of the family charity. It is not the appellant''s case that the charitable trust has been put an end to and so long as the trust lasts, the land
is prima facie not alienable. The order for investment was therefore rightly made. If the appellant wishes to have the investment changed and landed
property acquired with the money deposited, that can of course be done on proper application.
The appeal is dismissed with costs.