Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Shiva Constech Private Limited vs ACIT Circle 22(2) New Delhi

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 12 August 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Balaganesh, J · Sudhir Kumar, J
RESULT
Appeal allowed for statistical purposes
CASE NUMBER
ITA No.92/DEL/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 390 words

PER SUDHIR KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Ld. NFAC)”] vide order dated 19-11-2025 pertaining to A.Y. 2019-20, arising out the assessment order dated 01-03-2024 under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, (in short ‘the Act’).

2.

The brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed the return of income for A.Y.2019-20 declaring total income 91,82,280/- on 26-09-2019The department has information that the assessee company has taken accommodation entry of Rs.54,85,461/- during the F.Y.2018-19. The case of the assessee was reopened under section 147 of the Act. The Assessing Officer concluded that assessee had obtained accommodation entry from Sumit Jindal through bogus companies namely Om Trading Co. The assessee has failed to furnish any evidences against the bogus entry. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment under section 147 r.w.s. 144B after making the addition of Rs.54,85,461/- under section 68 of the Act.

3.

Aggrieved the order of the ld. AO the assessee preferred the appeal before the Ld. NFAC, who vide its order dated 19-11-2025 dismissed the appeal of the assessee. Being aggrieved the order of the Ld. NFAC the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.

4.

We have heard the Ld. DR and perused the material available on record. It is evident from the order that the appeal was dismissed by exparte because the assessee did not file any submissions before the Ld. NFAC.

5.

Since in the instant case the appeal was decided by ex-parte, therefore, considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, we deem it proper to restore the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) with a direction to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its claim and decide the issue as per fact and law. The assessee is also directed to appear before the Ld. CIT(A) and co-operate in the proceedings. The grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes.

6.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court 12.08.2026.

Sd/- Sd/-(M. BALAGANESH) (SUDHIR KUMAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (JUDICIAL MEMBER)

Footnotes

  1. 1.SR BHATTANGAR
  2. 2.Date: 12.08.2026
  3. 3.Copy forwarded to:
  4. 4.1. Appellant
  5. 5.2. Respondent
  6. 6.3. CIT
  7. 7.4. CIT(Appeals) `
  8. 8.5. DR: ITAT
  9. 9.ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
  10. 10.ITAT DELHI