High CourtsDivision Bench(2019) 10 CHH CK 0227

Shital Prasad Patanwar vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 24 October 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.R. Ramachandra Menon, CJ · Parth Prateem Sahu, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
WPPIL No. 85 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 321 words

P.R. Ramachandra Menon, CJ

1.

The grievance of the petitioner projected in this matter styled as a 'public interest litigation' is with regard to the prayer to direct the respondent,

particularly, the State, to make 'Chhattisgarhi' language as a compulsory subject to be taught in the primary and middle schools situated in the entire

State of Chhattisgarh.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the grievance as above has already been projected by way of Annexure P/1 representation, which

is pending consideration. It is also pointed out that, under similar circumstances, with regard to the prayer to make 'Oriya' as a compulsory subject, the

State had already expressed its stand that if a proper representation was submitted, it would be considered and appropriate order would be passed

within specified time as discernible from Annexure P/3 judgment passed by this Court. Learned counsel seeks for similar relief.

3.

We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Deputy Advocate General who made similar submissions, as made when the

matter was considered leading to Annexure P/3 verdict.

4.

On going through the proceedings, we find that Annexure P/1 representation put-forth by the petitioner is before the Hon'ble Chief Minister of the

State and not before the Secretary. We presume that, by all probabilities, the said proceedings would have been forwarded to the Secretary. However,

the petitioner is set at liberty to file a proper representation before the Secretary as aforesaid within 2 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the

judgment; upon which the same shall be considered and appropriate orders shall be passed after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner,

as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 3 months thereafter.

5.

The writ petition stands disposed of. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with the copy of the writ petition before the 1 st

respondent for further steps.