High CourtsDivision Bench(1998) 06 CAL CK 0014

Shita Ram Shaw vs Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 23 June 1998 · Citation: (1998) 2 CALLT 560

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satyabrata Sinha, J · Dibyendu Bhusan Dutta, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction F.M.A. No. 376 of 1996

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 365 words

S.B. Sinha, J.—Keeping in view the fact involved in this case, the appeal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, is treated on the day''s list although no paper book is filed.

2.

This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 12.2.95 passed by the Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Alipore, whereby and whereunder the said learned court dismissed an application for claim filed by the appellant. The fact of the matter is not in dispute. The son of the appellant died in accident which took place on 4.5.91. The owner of the vehicle did not contest the claim but insurance company did. On the pleading of the parties, the learned trial Judge frames certain issues. It is accepted that a sum of Rs. 25,000/- have been paid to the appellant which was payable in terms of section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. It appears that the learned Tribunal below did not accede to the prayer of the appellant in respect of the damages suffered by him on the ground that the appellant could not prove any pecuniary loss due to pre-matures death of his son. Although son of the appellant may not be earning, but the learned trial Judge was bound to consider the question as to whether the appellant had suffered any damages by way of mental agony, funeral expenses, loss of love and affection and/or on any other head.

3.

The learned Tribunal having not considered this aspect of the matter, the impugned judgment cannot be sustained which is accordingly set aside and the matter is remitted back to the learned Tribunal below for a fresh decision on the points of law. If the parties consider it necessary to adduce any other or further evidence, the learned Tribunal below shall give an opportunity to them to do so.

4.

The learned Tribunal below shall hearing out the matter expeditiously.

5.

This appeal is allowed without any costs.

6.

Let the lower court records be sent down immediately through a special messenger at the costs of the appellant, which costs may be put in within one week from date.

D.B. Dutta, J.--I agree.

7.

Appeal allowed