High CourtsSingle Bench(2019) 09 P&H CK 0219

Shinder Singh vs Union Of India And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 27 September 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Gurvinder Singh Gill, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 23793 Of 2018 O&M)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 398 words

Gurvinder Singh Gill, J

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking issuance of a direction to respondent No.4-Superintendent, Central Jail, Bathinda to forward the case of the convict Shinder Singh (petitioner) to Commanding Officer, 10 Sikh Bn., C/o 56 APO-respondent No.3 for further putting up the case before the competent authority to consider his case for pre-mature release.

The petitioner stands convicted vide judgment dated 10.6.1998 passed in Summary General Court Martial (SGCM) for having murdered Naib Subedar Manjit Singh and Havaldar Hardial Singh of his unit. He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life.

The learned counsel representing the Union of India has, however, opposed the petition while submitting that since it is a case where the petitioner had brutally murdered two of his senior colleagues with the help of an 'axe', he does not deserve any leniencey in the matter.

A perusal of order dated 20.2.2017 (Annexure P-2) shows that the case of the petitioner for pre-mature release had been considered by Chief of Army staff but was rejected. It is now more than 2 years and 7 months since the aforesaid rejection of the case of the petitioner for pre-mature release. The petitioner, as of now, has undergone an actual sentence of imprisonment of about 16 years and a total of about 22 years.

This Court is of the opinion that in view of the aforesaid efflux of time ever since the rejection of the case of the petitioner for pre-mature release in the year 2017, his case may be considered afresh by the authorities concerned. Respondent No.4-Superintendent, Central Jail, Bathinda, as such, is directed to process the case of the petitioner for pre-mature release and put up the same before the authorities concerned, so that the same may be considered afresh.

The Army Authorities shall do the needful for processing the case of the petitioner and for taking a final decision in the matter preferably within a period of 3 months from receipt of the case of the petitioner from the Superintendent, Central Jail, Bathinda.

A copy of this order be sent to respondent No.4-Superintendent, Central Jail, Bathinda.

Since the petitioner stands convicted by Summary General Court Martial (SGCM), his case is required to be considered for pre-mature release in terms of Section 179 of Army Act, 1950. The needful shall be done by the authorities concerned.

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.