High CourtsDivision Bench(1878) 02 CAL CK 0001

Sheo Gholam Sahoo vs Rahut Hossein

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 25 February 1878 · Citation: (1879) ILR (Cal) 7

HON’BLE JUDGES
McDonell, J · Ainslie, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 120 words

Ainslie, J.—If the money and property was sufficient for the satisfaction of the decree, it was not necessary for any further proceedings to be taken in execution. So far as the money is concerned, when the appeal was dismissed, it must be taken to have been transferred to the credit of the decree-holder, and the Court should similarly deal with the jewels pledged, converting them into cash for his benefit.

2.

The District Judge reversed the order of the first Court on the ground that the decree was barred by limitation, but we are of opinion that no question of limitation arises.

3.

The appeal must be decreed with costs, and the order of the Court of first instance restored.