High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 11 BOM CK 0024

Shekhar Gaonkar vs State Of Goa

Bombay High Court · Decided on 3 November 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manish Pitale, J
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 2296 Of 2021 (Filing) In Public Interest Litigation WP No. 27 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 192 words

Manish Pitale, J

1.

This application was mentioned by the learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant at 10.30 this morning, projecting extreme urgency in the matter. It was directed to be listed at the end of the admission board today.

2.

By this application, the Applicant seeks to bring to the notice of this Court that the Respondent no. 5 i.e. the Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority (GCZMA) is proceeding to decide the matter as directed by this Court but, in violation of the letter and spirit to the direction given by this Court. It is claimed that if the said Respondent is not restrained from passing any order in the matter during the pendency of the present application, the application itself would be rendered infructuous inasmuch as the said Respondent has kept the matter for further consideration/order on 11.11.2021.

3.

Prima facie, it appears that there is substance in the contention raised on behalf of the Applicant. Accordingly, the application is directed to be listed for consideration on 17.11.2021 before the appropriate Bench.

4.

In the meanwhile, the Respondent no.5-GCZMA shall not pass any order pursuant to hearing conducted on 02.11.2021.