AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Heard parties.
This writ application has been filed for a direction to
the respondent authorities to grant promotion and consequential
monetary benefits to the petitioner after dropping the departmental
proceeding initiated against him on the consideration of the
representation dated 09.12.2016 filed by the petitioner.
A departmental proceeding was initiated against the
petitioner vide Annexure 3 dated 12.08.2015.
At the time of hearing of this writ application, the
petitioner confines his relief only for a direction to the disciplinary
authority to take a final decision in his matter in which departmental
proceeding was initiated against him in the facts and circumstances as
stated below.
By filing supplementary affidavit, the petitioner draws
attention that the enquiry was held and enquiry officer has submitted
his report which has been appended as Annexure P to the
supplementary affidavit on 29.03.2016 exonerating him from the
charges. However, a show cause notice was issued against the
petitioner seeking his reply as disciplinary authority was not agreeing
with the finding of the enquiry officer. Petitioner claims that he filed
reply and, thereafter, the matter proceeded and vide Annexure Q, a
proposal was forwarded to the Minister-in-Charge to accept the
explanation of the petitioner and drop/consign the disciplinary
proceeding. Thereafter, there is a report of the Chief Secretary on the
file dated 07.10.2016 stating that for the aforesaid irregularities, if the
department does not find the delinquent officer responsible then it
may be clarified that who were responsible for holding examination,
evaluation and publication of result so that responsibility could be
fixed for the aforesaid irregularities.
It is contended that the departmental proceeding,
which commenced in the year 2015, has not been concluded by
taking a final decision as yet and the petitioner is going to retire on
31st of January, 2017.
In above view of the matter, this writ application is
being disposed of with a direction to the disciplinary authority to take
a final decision on its own merit and in accordance with law in the
departmental proceeding initiated against the petitioner, on or before
31st of January, 2017 as petitioner is going to retire on that date.
It goes without saying that if the petitioner is
exonerated then he would be entitled for all the consequential
benefits.
