High CourtsFull Bench(1918) 04 CAL CK 0030

Sheikh Tamiz Munshi alias Tamizud-Din Munshi vs Bisweswari Debyachowdhurani

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 29 April 1918 · Citation: 46 Ind. Cas. 862

HON’BLE JUDGES
Syed Shamsul Huda, J · John Woodroffe, J · Charles Chitty, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 138 words

John Woodroffe, J.—In my opinion there was in fact a surrender of the whole holding. I agree with Mr. Justice Newbould when he says: "It may be conceded that relinquishment of the holding means a relinquishment of the whole holding but the whole holding has been surrendered. The part sold to the defendant-appellant was expressly surrendered and the taking of a new settlement of the remainder of the holding operated in law as an implied surrender of the remaining portion."

2.

It has been said that this is a new case. It, however, arises as a point of law on the admitted facts, and on the findings of the facts as found by the Subordinate Judge.

3.

This appeal is, therefore, dismissed with costs.

Charles Chitty, J.

4.

I agree.

Syed Shamsul Huda, J.

5.

I also agree.