High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 02 DEL CK 0264

Sheetal Jain vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 25 February 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 2129 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

30 paragraphs · 441 words

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J

CM APPL.6222/2021(exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 2129/2021 & CM APPL.6221/2021(stay)

1.

Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, learned Additional Standing counsel GNCTD has filed, over e-mail of the Court Master, the notification dated

23.02.2021, issued by the Government of NCT of Delhi, notifying the appointment of the Presiding Officer for the Appellate Tribunal, MCD. The

same is taken on record.

2.

Petitioner impugns the demolition order dated 12.01.2021.

3.

Learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 submits that the regularisation application of the petitioner has already been dismissed by order

dated 01.12.2010.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents were directed by the Appellate Tribunal, MCD by its order dated 06.02.2012 to

decide the application for regularization afresh.

5.

Learned counsel submits that admittedly Corporation has not passed any fresh order on the regularization application as directed by the Appellate

Tribunal by its order dated 06.02.2012.

6.

Apart from directing the respondents to decide the regularisation application afresh and not to demolish the property of the petitioner till then, order

dated 06.02.2012 directs that petitioner shall demolish all non-compoundable/unauthorized construction in her flat, if any, as pointed out by the

respondent and shall deposit the compounding charges as applicable in respect of the entire building.

7.

It is not the case of the respondent that after the order dated 06.02.2012, the non-compoundable/unauthorized construction in her flat has been

pointed to the petitioner.

8.

Since the order of the Appellate Tribunal dated 06.02.2012 has not been complied with by the respondent corporation and a decision on the

regularization application has not been taken afresh, the Corporation could not have passed the subject demolition order dated 12.01.2021.

9.

This demolition order dated 12.01.2021 is accordingly quashed. Respondent/Corporation is now once again directed to comply with the direction of

the Tribunal dated 06.02.2012 to re-consider the regularization application of the appellant.

10.

Respondent shall first indicate to the petitioner the non-compoundable deviation/unauthorized construction in the flat as directed by Tribunal by its

order dated 06.02.2012 and also communicate the compounding charges as applicable and thereafter on petitioner complying with the condition

imposed by order dated 06.02.2012 of removing the non-compoundable deviations and payment of the regularization charges, the application of the

petitioner for regularisation shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law.

11.

It is directed that at the time of consideration of the application personal hearing shall also be granted to the petitioner.

12.

Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

13.

Copy of the Order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email.