High CourtsSingle Bench(2005) 03 MP CK 0068

Sheel Kumar vs State

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 16 March 2005 · Citation: (2005) 2 MPHT 189

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.K. Pande, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 1389 of 2004

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 174 words

S.K. Pande, J.—This is an application u/s 389(1), Cr.PC for suspension of order recording conviction of appellant u/s 13(1)(e), 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 vide impugned judgment dated 11-8-2004 passed by Special Judge, Damoh in Special Case No. 2/98.

2.

Vide order dated 20-8-2004, execution of sentence of imprisonment vide impugned judgment was suspended. As has been held in Benzamin Khiro alias Kiro, Ananta Sharan Hota, Rajendra Prasad, Udayanath Behera and Hemanta Kumar Patnaik Vs. State of Orissa and Another, , Ramesh Narang Vs. Rama Narang and Others, , expression order appealed against u/s 389 does not include conviction. Conviction of appellant can not be suspended u/s 389 or under any other provisions of Code.

3.

In M. Srinivasulu Reddy Vs. State Inspector of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Nellore Range, Nellore, , also it has been held that suspension of conviction pending appeal is not contemplated by provisions of Cr.PC or any Rules or Regulations or other enactment. As such, application seeking suspension of conviction as prayed, fails and is dismissed.