High CourtsSingle Bench(2013) 01 BOM CK 0062

Shashikant Goma Patil and Another vs The State of Maharashtra

Bombay High Court · Decided on 18 January 2013 · Citation: (2013) ALLMR(Cri) 2112

HON’BLE JUDGES
Abhay M. Thipsay, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Bail Application No. 7 of 2013

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 175 words

Abhay M. Thipsay, J.—Heard Mr. Nitin Sejpal, learned counsel for the applicants. Heard Ms. S.V. Sonawane, learned APP for the State. Heard Mr. Prashant Patil, learned counsel who sought intervention on behalf of the First Informant to oppose the grant of bail. I have gone through the First Information Report and glanced through the statements recorded during investigation. There exists a prima facie case of cruelty against the applicants.

2.

It appears that the deceased Minal committed suicide. There is no suspicion that the death of the said Minal is homicidal.

3.

The applicants are in custody since 12 December 2012. Their further detention does not seem to be essential from the point of view of investigation.

4.

Keeping this in mind, I am inclined to release them on bail. The applicants are ordered to be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- each with one surety in like amount, on the condition to attend the concerned police station, and make themselves available for investigation/interrogation, as and when required by the Investigating Officer.