High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 10 UK CK 0073

Shashank Sharma vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 17 October 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pankaj Purohit, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition Miscellaneous Single No. 2348 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 220 words

Pankaj Purohit, J

1.

By means of this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the order dated 23.08.2023, passed by the Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department in D.I.N. No.ITBA/PNL/F/270A/2023-24/1055522769(1),whereby the Income Tax Department has allegedly wrongly passed an ex-parte order of assessment concluding a recovery amount of Rs.15,73,44,050/-.

2.

Learned counsel for respondent no.2-department has drawn the attention of this Court to the order dated 23.08.2023 in D.I.N. No.ITBA/PNL/F/ 270A/2023-24/1055522769(1) challenged by the petitioner in the present writ petition. He further submits that the order in original passed by the Assessing Officer is already under challenge under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act, 1961”) in a revision petition, which is still pending. He also submits that the order impugned in the present writ petition is appealable by filing an appeal under Section 253 of the Act, 1961 before the Appellate Tribunal. The petitioner has wrongly chosen the Forum of the writ petition for challenging the said order. He may very well maintain an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner admitted this legal position.

4.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in-limine. However, the petitioner is given a liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal against the order dated 23.08.2023.

5.

Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly.