High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 04 MAD CK 0043

Shanmugam @ Sambath vs State

Madras High Court · Decided on 4 April 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
C.V.Karthikeyan, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition No. 7493 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 372 words

C.V.Karthikeyan, J

1.

The petitioner/accused in Crime No.02 of 2024, registered by the respondent police for the offences under Sections 9(m) r/w 10 of POCSO Act, 2012 and 506 (i) of IPC by the respondent police and remanded to judicial custody on 23.01.2024, seeks bail.

2.

The petitioner is married and has two daughters. The victim is aged 10 years old. It is stated that the petitioner had initially committed the offence on 16.12.2023 and a complaint was lodged and the petitioner was warned. Subsequently, again he had committed the same offence on 23. 01.2024, leading to registration of FIR, on receipt of the complaint.

3.

The earlier application seeking bail was dismissed on 04.03.2024 in Crl.O.P.No.5143 of 2024.

4.

The substantial change in circumstance is that investigation has been completed and final report has also been filed before the Special Court for POCSO Act at Coimbatore. Taking that fact into consideration, bail is granted to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

5.

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Principal Special Court of Exclusive Trial cases under POCSO Act, Coimbatore and on further conditions that :-

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.