Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2005) 02 SC CK 0114

Shankarapa Kubbanna Kattimani vs Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 4 February 2005 · Citation: (2006) 2 RCR(Criminal) 228 : (2005) 12 SCC 266

HON’BLE JUDGES
D.M. Dharmadhikari, J · B.N. Srikrishna, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 890 of 2005 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 18102 of 2003)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 245 words
1.

Delay condoned.

2.

Leave granted.

3.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

4.

By the impugned order, the High Court has reduced the total amount of compensation in the sum of Rs. 2,04,800/- awarded by the Tribunal to Rs. 1,07,000/-. The reason assigned by the High Court for reducing the quantum of compensation is stated in para 9 of the impugned order thus:

In any event, even notionally taking income of a coolie Rs. 30/- per day and by applying multiplier 15 it comes to Rs. 1,50,000. 50% disability comes to Rs. 75,000/-. I am therefore inclined to grant Rs. 75,000/- in place of Rs. 1,72,800/- and adding Rs. 32,000/- under other conventional heads, the total compensation to which the claimant entitled to would be Rs. 1,07,000/-.

5.

After hearing learned Counsel for the parties, we find that the High Court committed a gross error in ignoring the fact that the claimant was a coolie doing manual labour for earning his livelihood. As a result of the accident his one arm was amputated which was almost total disability for earning. In such a situation, to reduce the quantum of compensation by treating disability at 50% was uncalled for. The Tribunal has in fact assessed the disability at 80%.

6.

Consequently, we allow this appeal, set aside the order of the High Court and restore the award made by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal.

7.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Appeal allowed.