High CourtsDivision Bench(2017) 06 SIK CK 0008

Shamsher Gurung VsState of Sikkim & Ors.

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 22 June 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satish K. Agnihotri, Meenakshi Madan Rai
CASE NUMBER
11 of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 172 words
1.

Questioning the legality of appointment of fourth respondent on the post of Secretary, Legal, Legislative and Parliamentary Affairs Department, Government of Sikkim, vide notification dated 06th October, 2016, the instant petition is filed by a public spirited person. The petitioner has further questioned the legality of notification dated 05th October, 2016, wherein the Government of Sikkim (Allocation of Business) Rules, 2004 was amended to accommodate the fourth respondent.

2.

It is brought to our notice that subsequently, the appointment of fourth respondent has been withdrawn vide notification dated 03rd February, 2017. Thus, according to the learned Advocate General, nothing survives for adjudication.

3.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submits that in view of the subsequent development, whereby the initial challenge has come to an end, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition.

4.

This is a well-settled proposition of law that the issue, which has become academic, may not be adjudicated for want of facts.

5.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as having become academic and infructuous.