High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 03 UK CK 0079

Shakuntala Modern Junior High School vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 5 March 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 506 Of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 344 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

This writ petition has been filed by Shakuntala Modern Junior High School, Pauri Garhwal seeking following reliefs:-

(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 08.10.2015 (contained as annexure no. 1 to this petition)

and the letter dated 28.09.2015 written by the govt. (as mentioned in the impugned order dated 08.10.2015) after summoning the original of the same

from the respondents.

(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to release the salary of the teachers and employees of the

petitioner’s school from 04.03.2014 and to continue to pay the same regularly every month.

2.

By the impugned order passed by Director, Elementary Education, Uttarakhand, petitioner has been removed from grant-in-aid list of the State

Government. In other words, the financial aid, which petitioner was receiving towards salary of teaching and non-teaching employees, stands

withdrawn.

3.

In para 12 of the writ petition, it is pleaded that neither opportunity of hearing was afforded to the petitioner nor any show cause notice was issued

before passing the impugned order.

4.

This pleading has not been denied in the counter affidavit filed by District Education Officer (Elementary Education), Pauri Garhwal. Thus,

respondents admit that the impugned order was passed without hearing petitioner.

5.

It is settled position in law that any order, which entails civil and evil consequences to a person can be passed only after affording reasonable

opportunity of hearing. Removal of name of the petitioner school from the grant-in-aid list of the State Government has civil and evil consequence to

the petitioner, as the liability of payment of salary of teaching and non-teaching employees would now been fastened upon the petitioner.

6.

Since the impugned order has been passed without affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, therefore, the writ petition is allowed.

Impugned order dated 08.10.2015 is quashed. However, Director, Elementary Education, Uttarakhand shall pass fresh order within three months, after

affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in accordance with law.