High CourtsDivision Bench(2026) 11 UK CK 0206

Shailendra Singh vs State Of Uttarakhand & Ors.

Uttarakhand High Court, Nainital · Decided on 2 November 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, A.C.J. · Subhash Upadhyay, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S/B) No.147 of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 358 words

(per Hon’ble Justice Sri Manoj Kumar Tiwari, A.C.J.)

1.

Petitioner is serving as Assistant Cane Commissioner and was posted in the office of Sugar and Cane Commissioner, Headquarter, Kashipur, Udham Singh Nagar since 07.02.2024. By order dated 25.04.2025, he was transferred as Assistant Cane Commissioner, Rudrapur, Udham Singh Nagar. After five days, said order was modified and petitioner was re-transferred in the office of Sugar and Cane Commissioner, Headquarter, Kashipur, Udham Singh Nagar, vide order dated 30.04.2025. This order is challenged by the petitioner in this writ petition.

2.

Petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 30.04.2025 mainly on the ground that another order could not have been passed within five days of the earlier transfer order dated 25.04.2025.

3.

Learned State Counsel, however, submits that since petitioner is a permanent resident of Tehsil Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar, therefore, as per Transfer Policy, he could not have been posted as Assistant Cane Commissioner in the same district i.e. Udham Singh Nagar.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are four sanctioned posts of Assistant Cane Commissioner, namely, Udham Singh Nagar, Haridwar, Dehradun and Headquarter, Kashipur.

5.

Mr. M.C. Kandpal, learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent no.5 supports the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner that there are only two persons, who are regularly promoted as Assistant Cane Commissioner and the other two positions of Assistant Cane Commissioner are manned by officiating appointment.

6.

Having regard to the fact that petitioner belongs to Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar, and as per Transfer Policy, Class II Officer cannot be posted in their home district, we decline to interfere with the order dated 30.04.2025, whereby petitioner was brought back from Udham Singh Nagar to the Headquarter, Kashipur. We, however, dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the Cane Commissioner to consider transferring the petitioner to any of the districts where post of Assistant Cane Commissioner is lying vacant. We hope and expect that necessary orders shall be passed within 15 days.

7.

Interim order dated 16.05.2025 is vacated. Only for a period of 15 days, status quo as regards petitioner’s posting shall be maintained.