High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 06 CHH CK 0089

Shailendra Jaiswal vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 19 June 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (T) No. 63 Of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 294 words

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1.

This writ petition was filed as public interest litigation questioning the enhancement of property tax pursuant to memo dated 31-8-2015 issued by the State Government, but the petitioner has not sought quashing of any order either passed by Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur or by the State of Chhattisgarh.

2.

Pursuant to the order passed by a Division Bench of this Court on 27- 3-2017, this matter is listed before this Court. The observation made by the Division Bench in this regard is pertinent (order dated 27-3- 2017) which is as follows: -

"4. Face with the aforesaid situation, learned counsel for the Petitioners in these two matters requested for an adjournment to file appropriate applications to convert these writ petitions in an attempt to sustain them as individual/private litigations, in the event of the petitioners being able to show cause that they have such individual cause of action to pursue the relief in relation to the taxing provisions concerned."

3.

In view of the above-stated observation, by order dated 24-4-2017, WP(PIL) was permitted / converted in this writ petition.

4.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

5.

A careful perusal of the petition would show that the petitioner is neither an aggrieved person individually nor claimed any relief against the respondents herein and not sought quashing of any order passed either by the State Government or by the Municipal Corporation. Therefore, in absence of proper averment and material on record, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition. However, the petitioner is at liberty to question the levy of property tax by the Municipal Corporation strictly in accordance with law.

6.

With the above-stated observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).