High CourtsDivision Bench(2026) 08 TEL CK 5581

Shaheen Educational Services Private Limited vs The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax & Ors.

Telangana High Court · Decided on 17 August 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Aparesh Kumar Singh, C.J · G.M. Mohiuddin, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 26851 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 370 words

Learned counsel Sri Nagendra Prasad appears for the petitioner.

Sri K.Sai Akarsh, learned Assistant Government Pleader, representing Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax, appears for respondents No.1 to 3.

2.

The writ petition has been preferred against the show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 dated 29.09.2025, the order in Form GST DRC-07 dated 08.12.2025 and the consequential recovery notice in Form GST DRC-13 dated 18.07.2026.

3.

The petitioner has approached this court alleging that impugned show cause notice and the order are unsigned documents and they are not valid or authentic.

4.

However, after some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the impugned order. He submits that some delay might have been occurred in approaching the appellate authority and therefore, the appellate authority may be directed to consider it sympathetically.

5.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for State Tax submits that the petitioner was at liberty to prefer an appeal against the impugned order taking all the grounds as are available in law and on facts before the appellate authority in respect of the subject tax period.

6.

However, upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties, since the petitioner seeks liberty to prefer an appeal, we do not wish to comment on the merits of the contentions raised by the parties.

7.

We grant liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal within a period of two weeks with statutory pre-deposit and a delay condonation application. The petitioner may take all such grounds of law and facts in the memo of appeal as are available to it. Needless to say, the appellate authority would consider the question of delay taking into account the aforesaid facts and circumstances and if he is satisfied on the point of delay, proceed to decide the appeal on merits in accordance with law. During the period of two weeks within which the petitioner has to file the appeal, no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner pursuant to the impugned garnishee notice.

8.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.