High CourtsDivision Bench(2013) 03 BOM CK 0041

Shafique Ali and Others vs State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay High Court · Decided on 14 March 2013 · Citation: (2013) ALLMR(Cri) 2796

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.C. Chavan, J · Prasanna B. Varale, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Application (Apl) No. 158 of 2013

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 168 words

R.C. Chavan, J.—Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties. This is an application by husband and in-laws of the victim who filed a report in respect of offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code on which the applicants have been charge-sheeted before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No. 5, Nagpur. First informant is present with her brother and mother. She states that she is actually staying with the applicant No. 1 and has absolutely no grievance. Since the parties have amicably settled their matrimonial dispute and are residing jointly, no fruitful purpose would be served by allowing the proceedings to proceed. The application is, therefore, allowed. The proceedings bearing Criminal Case No. 520/2009 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class. Court No. 5. Nagpur are quashed. Rule made absolute in above terms. No order as to costs.

Criminal Application (Appa) No. 162/2013

2.

In view of the above order, this application does not survive, hence disposed of.